<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Google Should Go Nuclear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unreasonable.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/why-google-should-go-nuclear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unreasonable.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/why-google-should-go-nuclear/</link>
	<description>A collection of things worth considering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:56:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Think or Thwim &#187; Green Venture Capital</title>
		<link>http://unreasonable.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/why-google-should-go-nuclear/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Think or Thwim &#187; Green Venture Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonable.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/why-google-should-go-nuclear/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>[...] that make significant advances in green technology.� I love the prize idea in general:� #1, #2.� However, this one doesn&#8217;t seem to be very effective for spurring innovation.� � [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that make significant advances in green technology.� I love the prize idea in general:� #1, #2.� However, this one doesn&#8217;t seem to be very effective for spurring innovation.� � [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
